Review: Doomsday Book

I just finished reading Connie Willis’s Doomsday Book. Let me just say that I am significantly less than whelmed. If there’s a bar here, about yay high, and it’s got “Whelmed” written on it in big block letters, this book is significantly under the bar.

Now I understand why it is a popular book. It is conventional. Very few, if any, science fiction tropes are involved at all (aside from some cutesie names, such as “vids” for “movies”, all phone calls are videophone calls [although none of those are cellphone calls; the book was written in the painfully early nineties, so it gets a pass on that one], and time travel). The drama of the story is in efforts of the two protagonists, Kivrin in the 1300s and Dunworthy in the 2050s, trying to get Kivrin out of the plague. But the drama is conventional drama. There is no sensawonder here. Which would be fine, if there were some Weighty Concepts of Great Literature being explored here. But there’s none of those either. Here’s what I would consider the themes of the book (if I was forced to by an English Teacher with a weapon of some sort):

The plot drives me batty for the same reason that the plot of Pride and Prejudice drives me batty: that’s it? Oh, so the whole reason this easily- foreseen and overly-foreshadowed dilemma has come to pass is for that stupid reason? Granted, it’s not quite so dumb as Pride and Prejudice, but each plot element was, when it wasn’t expected, pretty non-surprising (hint: it often involved people dying you didn’t necessarily expect to die). I admire Willis for willingly killing off her characters, but fer-cryin’-out-loud, it gets old.

I’m one of those people who will not finish a book if I’m not getting enough out of it. I finished the book. So it’s not a total failure. But the more I reflect on it, the more I could have done without this book. So I think I’ll stop reflecting on it.


P.F. Hawkins

2007-08-30

Back to posts